|
|
|
|
IntelliChoice Value Rating
The chart above shows the purchase price versus ownership cost for each car from a specific vehicle class. The cars with better than average ownership cost/purchase price correlations are the best values, and these best value cars are represented by the dots below the curve. (i.e. the cars that have a lower ownership cost compared to its purchase price.) Those cars, which are worse than average or poor values, appear above the curve.
One way to view the graph is to draw a vertical line through any purchase price. You may see several dots that fall on this line - each of which is a car with a similar purchase price. However, notice the difference in ownership costs of each car represented by the vertical position of the dot. Two cars with the same purchase price can have thousands of dollars difference in ownership costs. This is what separates "good value" cars from "poor value" cars.
What is a good car value?
A "good car value" is one whose cost to own and operate is less than expected. The lower the cost to own and operate a car compared to what is expected, the better the value of that car.
But how do we know a car's "expected cost"?
For each car in the class, IntelliChoice plots the car's purchase price against the total five-year cost to own and operate it as determined by IntelliChoice research. Each dot on the above chart represents a specific car. Generally, we find that as the purchase price of the car increases, the cost to own and operate that car increases. This is why the dots on the graph tend to rise upward and to the right. This phenomenon also makes intuitive sense - as the purchase price rises, financing costs tend to rise, as do insurance, depreciation, taxes, and most other car ownership costs.
This is an important concept. It's normal for car ownership costs to rise as purchase price rises. Therefore, we can't just establish one "average" ownership cost number for each class, since cars in the class have different purchase prices. (This is why the "Relative" shown on each chart is different for cars in the same car class.)
Using statistical techniques, IntelliChoice "connects the dots" to form a curve that defines, for this car class, the relationship between the car's purchase price and car's ownership costs. This curve is our "expected cost" curve. The curve defines, for any car in the class, the five-year ownership cost that we would expect to see at each possible purchase price. If every car in the class were an average value, then all the dots would fall exactly on the curve. However, it's rare that any dot is exactly on the curve. Some dots are a little higher or lower, and some are a lot higher or lower. The dots that are a little lower are better than average car values, while the dots that are a lot lower are excellent car values (A dot that is a lot lower than the curve has ownership costs much lower than expected for a car of its purchase price). Conversely, a dot a little higher than the curve is a poorer than average car value, while a dot that is much higher than the curve is a poor car value.
Value is a relative term, not an absolute term. It is performing better than the logical expectation.
So is a Mercedes-Benz E320 expensive to own and operate? Certainly in an absolute sense. Most other cars cost less. But, when its cost to own and operate is plotted against cars with comparable invoice prices, the E320 costs less. So the E320 is not expensive to own and operate - it is a good car value. The Mercedes does not have low ownership costs, but it has low ownership costs for its invoice price.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Article From 5.0 Mustang & Super Fords Magazine
Mustang 5.0 Stroker Install - Return To Glory
We Bring Our 3g GT's Modular Engine Up To 5.0 Liters With The Help Of Livernois And Steeda
writer: Mark Houlahan photographer: Mark Houlahan
Horse Sense: Livernois uses the big-bore approach to pull 5.0 liters out of the 4.6 block by going to a 3.700 bore size. Some companies use the typical stroker crank route to get 5.0 liters from their 4.6 assemblies. Both camps have their supporters, but displacement is displacement no matter how you get it, and more is always better, in our book. Our 3g GT's stock 4.6 modular was far from tired. The engine had only a tick more than 20,000 miles on it, even after driving the project car back from the World Ford Challenge last year. So why would we go with the expense of a custom-built 5.0 modular and the associated work of swapping the engine and tuning the whole shebang? It's simple, really. As 5.0 Mustang & Super Fords' premiere corporately owned project car, the 3g gets the best of the best. It's also our only in-house modular vehicle that's stock enough for major engine projects. We knew that with Associate Editor Johnson's big left foot and the ProCharger's boost, the car wouldn't live happily ever after, so we hatched a plan to put some much needed security and longevity into the 3g's engine bay by way of a super-stout, yet civil, modular engine buildup.  A familiar sight for sure-the 3g spinning the dyno rollers. Steeda's Steve Chichisola does the honors of breaking in our new Livernois 5.0 modular and gathering all the dyno data. He also turned the wrenches on the complete swap. Thanks again, Steve! There are several companies building performance modular engines for Mustangs these days. You can find everything from basic, Cobra-spec short-blocks all the way to turbo-ready, racing long-blocks. Working with Dan Millen and his boys at Livernois Motorsports, we put together on paper one of their 5.0 big-bore modular engines with custom ported heads, custom cams, and a bunch of other Livernois goodies and secrets stuffed inside. You've seen the engine buildup and had a glimpse of the headwork in previous articles, but our completed engine project needed to make its way to us. Since it wasn't going to jump into the engine bay and install itself, we rang up our friends at Steeda Autosports-modular experts in their own rights-to give us a hand with the engine swap and tuning, especially since we were already running Steeda's custom tuning. With everyone on the same page, we had Livernois ship the engine directly to Steeda. We showed up in the 3g with a fresh case of oil, gaskets, injectors, and so on to complete the project with a minimum of hassle. Take a look at the swap (the Steeda folks make it look so easy!), and then check out our dyno sidebar to see what our screaming-yellow ricer magnet is pushing these days.  The Livernois 5.0 modular showed up at Steeda wearing the same components it was dyno tested with at Livernois. We'll be sticking with our Reichard intake for now, but as more 4.6 intakes are released, you can bet we'll try them on the 3g. |  As soon as Steve had our "before" dyno runs logged, he had the 3g on Steeda's drive-on lift and was tearing into the project. By the time we got our cameras unpacked, he was already yanking out the transmission. The driveshaft, H-pipe, and other undercar items were removed for access. |  Relieving the engine compartment of its modular powerplant is no more complicated than removing a pushrod engine from Mustangs past. The rubber engine mounts utilize a stud-and-nut arrangement similar to that of the Fox Mustang. Using a swivel socket and extension, Steve removes these two nuts (one per side) in preparation to lift out the engine. |  As with a 5.0 engine removal, the A/C system will stay with the car. Here, Steve unbolts the compressor from its location on the side of the block and pulls it out of the way for engine removal. |  After removing the battery and securing the battery cables for removal with the engine, Steve makes a final check of all wiring and hoses that need to be removed or disconnected for clearance. The engine lift is rolled into place to bring the engine out of its tight and cozy home between the Zinc Yellow inner fenders. |  Once the engine is out and safely situated on the shop floor, Steve removes all the components we will be swapping from the stock 4.6 to the new 5.0 Livernois powerhouse. The first part to be wrenched free is the Reichard intake, followed by the alternator, the coolant transfer tubes, the water pump, and so on. |
|
Ford Performance Group Reconnects with Enthusiasts
DEARBORN, Mich., April 17, 2007 – Ford Racing has launched an all-new web-based initiative, www.FordPerformance.com,...
04/21/2008 | 23:04 PM
|
|
Ford tapped racing history for SEMA models
LAS VEGAS, Oct. 30 -- Ford Racing proves once again that Mustang is meant for the track with the company's first...
11/29/2007 | 22:11 PM
|
|
2008 Ford Mustang an All-Star Winner by Government Standard
DEARBORN, Mich., Oct. 4, 2007 -- The Ford Mustang convertible, the best-selling convertible ever, is now the first...
10/25/2007 | 15:10 PM
|
|
Ford Mustang GT-R: Honoring racing past, future
Here’s a concept you could literally build on your own....
04/23/2007 | 21:04 PM
|
|
2010 Ford Mustang Inches Closer To Production
So what's up with the development of the 2010 Ford Mustang?...
08/15/2007 | 14:08 PM
|
|
|
|
Mustang Window Repair
It’s a good bet that Ford didn’t foresee the 1965-66 Mustangs being in service for 35-plus years. And, over the course of those 35 years, how many times have those driver-side windows been u...
more
|
|
First Test: 2007 Ford Shelby GT
They'll build as many Shelby GTs as people will buy, capping the production at 10,000 units to maintain exclusivity. They'll peg that meter easily, as the car carries legit Shelby cachet and is a sure...
more
|
|
5.0 Mustang Upgrades
If you want to make your 5.0 Mustang the baddest in your neighborhood, all it takes is some patience and the right combination of parts. When you get right down to performance, the answers lie in simp...
more
|
|
|
| |